Similarities relative and absolute dating local dating cams com
It is notable that some skeptics criticise creationists when they retract doubtful arguments, but these are also the same people who accuse creationists of being unwilling to change their minds!Persisting in using discredited arguments simply rebounds—it’s the truth that sets us free (John ), not error, and Christ (John 14:6)!But his observations fit perfectly with the true biblical view that there was a global Flood, and that animals migrated from Ararat to the islands via the neighbouring mainland.This should be a lesson for those today who teach that Christians should compromise the plain meaning of the Bible to fit with ‘science’.The other articles provide examples of arguments that we think should no longer be used; some arguments are definitely fallacious, while others are merely doubtful or unsubstantiated.We provide brief explanations why, and/or hyperlinks to other articles on this Web site with more detailed explanations.
For example, Darwin pointed out that the fashionable theory taught by Lyell, of fixity of species—that each species had been independently created in their current location—made little sense of his observations that island species were often similar to those of the nearest continent.
So we urge Christians to ensure that their stance comes from being pro-Bible, not a knee-jerk anti-establishmentism. notes: Many historians (of many different religious persuasions—including atheistic) have shown that modern science started to flourish only in largely Christian Europe (see The biblical roots of modern science).
These historians point out that the basis of modern science depends on the assumption that the universe was made by a rational creator (see Why does science work at all? An orderly universe makes perfect sense only if it were made by an orderly Creator.
Since there is so much good evidence for creation, there is no need to use any of the ‘doubtful’ arguments.
This page also shows why it is important for people to stay up-to-date with sound creationist literature, since these publications (e.g. In particular, we concentrate on the biblical teachings of creation by the Triune God, and that death is the result of sin.
Evolutionists continually revise their theories because of new data, so it should not be surprising or distressing that some creationist scientific theories need to be revised too.